On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:09:39 +0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:
> I would ask others but no one will acknowledge your existence anymore.
Hi badgolferman,
On that topic I would consider that a "good thing".
Given the apologists can only bullshit, almost all of them have realized
they can't stand up to something as simple as a fact.
So you will never see 99% of the Type III apologists responding to any of
my posts, because they realize they're so out of their league it's sad.
The _one_ moronic Type III apologist who does respond, is, sadly so,
Alan Baker, who is too stupid to even realize how stupid he really is.
Paradoxically, it is I who has him in my killfile (along with Snit,
Diesel, Gremlin, Rudy Wieser, and a few other utter morons).
Even the Type II apologists like Steve Scharf and Alan Browne realize
they're so out of their league when they come up against me that they
simply go quiet when we show their cites to be complete bullshit.
For example, just today, Steve tried to pile on the cites, where none of
them were even recent, and two of them said the exact _opposite_ of what
Steve claimed they said, and most were from 2011 and 2014, where coverage
is something that changes a lot in the past decade.
So rest assured it's a "good thing" when apologists realize they're
completely out of their league with me, as none of them handles facts like
I can. (e.g., I doubt Steve or Alan Browne have science or math or
engineering degrees simply because they don't seem to be able to
doublecheck their facts).
Bearing in mind my facts are _never_ wrong, the _only_ apologist who "can"
handle facts is, again, paradoxically, nospam himself.
He actually "sometimes" knows more than I do although his credibility is
worse than that of a coin toss simply because he'll defend any Apple
MARKETING decision to the death (e.g., he still claims that the iPhone X
doesn't have throttling while Apple themselves admits they added throttling
software in October of 2019, just months after telling Congress in February
of that year that throttling software wasn't "as" necessary for the iPhone
8 and iPhone X, and yet, there it is).
In summary, the apologists hate me, badgolferman, simply because they've
never found even a single fact from me to be materially wrong - and that's
saying a lot given how many facts I post to this newsgroup that they hate.
And that's a good thing.
The _less_ the apologists post to this newsgroup, the higher the quality of
thee threads to this newsgroup will be.
Only nospam knows what he's talking about, but, unfortunately, he'll never
take a position that is the antithesis of Apple MARKETING's position, so
you need someone like me, who comprehends facts, to counter his bullshit.
If nospam simply stuck to the facts, he'd be fine though.
o As he's the only apologist who actually comprehends the salient facts.
But he often turns into "instant child" when he can't confront facts.
o It's why he's an apologist, after all, badgolferman.
None of the apologists own adult skills when confronted with facts.
--
Posted to explain that it's a good thing apologists have realized they have
absolutely no adult defense to something as simple as a fact.